Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm: Factor-out drm_emit_vblank_event code.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 10:36 +0200, Michel DÃnzer wrote:
> On Mit, 2011-04-27 at 16:10 +1000, christopher.halse.rogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Christopher James Halse Rogers <christopher.halse.rogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christopher James Halse Rogers <christopher.halse.rogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c |   39 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> >  1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> > index 72407fa..485714b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> > @@ -930,6 +930,18 @@ void drm_vblank_put(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_vblank_put);
> >  
> > +static void drm_emit_vblank_event (struct drm_pending_vblank_event *e,
> > +				   unsigned int seq, struct timeval *now)
> > +{
> > +	e->event.sequence = seq;
> > +	e->event.tv_sec = now->tv_sec;
> > +	e->event.tv_usec = now->tv_usec;
> > +	list_move_tail(&e->base.link, &e->base.file_priv->event_list);
> > +	wake_up_interruptible(&e->base.file_priv->event_wait);
> > +	trace_drm_vblank_event_delivered(e->base.pid, e->pipe,
> > +					 e->event.sequence);
> > +}
> > +
> >  void drm_vblank_off(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc)
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_pending_vblank_event *e, *t;
> > @@ -950,14 +962,8 @@ void drm_vblank_off(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc)
> >  			  wanted %d, current %d\n",
> >  			  e->event.sequence, seq);
> >  
> > -		e->event.sequence = seq;
> > -		e->event.tv_sec = now.tv_sec;
> > -		e->event.tv_usec = now.tv_usec;
> >  		drm_vblank_put(dev, e->pipe);
> > -		list_move_tail(&e->base.link, &e->base.file_priv->event_list);
> > -		wake_up_interruptible(&e->base.file_priv->event_wait);
> > -		trace_drm_vblank_event_delivered(e->base.pid, e->pipe,
> > -						 e->event.sequence);
> > +		drm_emit_vblank_event(e, seq, &now);
> >  	}
> 
> Makes sense, but shouldn't the drm_vblank_put() calls move into
> drm_emit_vblank_event() as well?

Possibly.  I felt that dropping the vblank reference was a conceptually
distinct action from emitting the vblank event, which is why I left it
out.  I'd be happy enough to have it as a part of drm_emit_vblank_event,
though.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux