Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm: Send pending vblank events before disabling vblank.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mit, 2011-04-27 at 16:10 +1000, christopher.halse.rogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Christopher James Halse Rogers <christopher.halse.rogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This is the least-bad behaviour.  It means that we signal the
> vblank event before it actually happens, but since we're disabling
> vblanks there's no guarantee that it will *ever* happen otherwise.

This may indeed be the best we can do for events that are pending when
the CRTC is disabled[0], but I can't see anything that would prevent new
events from getting scheduled (or synchronous vblank waits from timing
out) while the CRTC is disabled?

[0] Though it might unnecessarily send events prematurely when the CRTC
is just disabled temporarily, e.g. as part of a modeset.


Also, this patch won't seem to help at all for other drivers which don't
call drm_vblank_off() directly when disabling a CRTC.

Maybe it would be possible to move those calls to core code, and/or only
force sending out events when the CRTC isn't just getting disabled
temporarily.


-- 
Earthling Michel DÃnzer           |                http://www.vmware.com
Libre software enthusiast         |          Debian, X and DRI developer
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux