On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 03:20:49PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> There shouldn't be any other driver support necessary, since none of
> the driver-specific ioctls ever required auth, and none of them deal
> with modesetting.
Indeed, somehow I thought you need to mark them all up explicitly. But
that's only the case for DRM_AUTH ioctls.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
Aside: I wonder whether we should go through all the drivers and replace
DRM_AUTH | DRM_RENDER_ALLOW with 0? It looks a bit like drm ioctl flags
are cargo culted ...
-Daniel
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c
> index 54f9f52fa004..143dd98aa079 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c
> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static struct drm_driver vc4_drm_driver = {
> DRIVER_ATOMIC |
> DRIVER_GEM |
> DRIVER_HAVE_IRQ |
> + DRIVER_RENDER |
> DRIVER_PRIME),
> .lastclose = vc4_lastclose,
> .irq_handler = vc4_irq,
> --
> 2.8.0.rc3
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
