On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:16:18 -0700 Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:12:20 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Overlays are a bit like half-CRTCs. They have a location and fb, but > > don't drive outputs directly. Add support for handling them to the core > > KMS code. > > Are overlays/underlays not associated with a specific CRTC? To my mind, > overlays are another scanout buffer associated with a specific CRTC, so > you'd create a scanout buffer and attach that to a specific scanout slot > in a crtc, with the 'default' slot being the usual graphics plane. Yes, that matches my understanding as well. I've deliberately made the implementation flexible there though, under the assumption that some hardware allows a plane to be directed at more than one CRTC (though probably not simultaneously). Arguably, this is something we should have done when the connector/encoder split was done (making planes in general first class objects). But with today's code, treating a CRTC as a pixel pump and a primary plane seems fine, with overlays tacked onto the side as secondary pixel sources but tied to a specific CRTC. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
