Re: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: Return -EBUSY if there's already a pending flip event v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2016年04月01日 19:47, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On 04/01/2016 01:26 PM, Mark yao wrote:
On 2016年03月31日 16:08, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
As per the docs, atomic_commit should return -EBUSY "if an asycnhronous
updated is requested and there is an earlier updated pending".

v2: Use the status of the workqueue instead of vop->event, and don't add
a superfluous wait on the workqueue.

Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c | 3 +++
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c
index 3b8f652698f8..285f8cd5afe1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c
@@ -282,6 +282,9 @@ int rockchip_drm_atomic_commit(struct drm_device *dev,
  	struct rockchip_atomic_commit *commit = &private->commit;
  	int ret;
+ if (async && work_busy(&commit->work))
+		return -EBUSY;
+
Sorry for reply late.

There is a comment on work_busy function describe :

     "the test result is  unreliable and only useful as advisory hints or
for debugging."

I don't know if it's suitable to use it here, does some guys know it?
I'm not sure, but if the reason is the caveat explained in
find_worker_executing_work(), then it's probably safe (and would explain
how the function is used in other parts in the kernel).

And then, the "flush_work(&commit->work);" is no needed if return -EBUSY
here.
you can remove it at this patch.
We still need to wait if it's being called in sync mode.

Regards,

Tomeu
Hi TomeuHi

on sync mode, flush is no needed, because that:
1, there is mutex_lock/mutex_unlock on this context, So only single process run into commit work;

2, sync mode will block on:
rockchip_atomic_commit_complete-->rockchip_atomic_wait_for_complete,

Thanks.


  	ret = drm_atomic_helper_prepare_planes(dev, state);
  	if (ret)
  		return ret;


--
Mark Yao






--
Mark Yao


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux