2016-03-31 19:04 GMT+09:00 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:35:11AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: >> Well, it has to be one or the other: mixing explicit and implicit, >> defeats the purpose of using explicit fencing. So, when explicit >> fencing is in use, implicit fences must be ignored. > > You can mix it, if you're careful. CrOS wants that to better mesh android > with Ozone, and we'll be discussing what needs to be added to be able to > make it work implicit and explicit fencing work together, in both > directions. Of course this should only be used for shared buffers, e.g. > explicit syncing in an android client running on top of implicitly synced > ozone/kms. Good idea. I hope fence things of mainline would be more discussed so could be considered for many cases. Thanks, Inki Dae > -Daniel > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > http://blog.ffwll.ch > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
