On 30 March 2016 at 14:53, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> virtual is a protected keyword in C++ and can't be used at all. Ugh.
>>
>> This aligns the kernel versions of the drm headers with the ones in
>> libdrm.
>>
>> Cc: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> include/uapi/drm/drm.h | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
>> index a0ebfe7c9a28..d299c7749091 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
>> @@ -373,7 +373,11 @@ struct drm_buf_pub {
>> */
>> struct drm_buf_map {
>> int count; /**< Length of the buffer list */
>> +#ifdef __cplusplus
>> + void *virt;
>
> Shouldn't this also be __user for consistency? (I realize it'll never
> play since the kernel doesn't get built with C++...)
>
Yes please. There is also a bunch of extern C guards that could be
nice, but that's a whole another thing.
-Emil
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
