On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, Sebastian Reichel <sre@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 02:40:53PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Sebastian Reichel <sre@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 02:14:26PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> > + >> >> > + /* panel is 480x464 with top and bottom 5 lines not visible */ >> >> >> >> I assume you mean 480x864 ? >> > >> > Yes, nice catch. Basically the screen is 480x864, but only >> > 480x854 are visible. >> >> It's been a while, but I thought the full 480x864 was actually usable >> and visible. > > I tried that first and the first few lines were missing. The stock > kernel also uses only 854px: > > https://github.com/nemomobile/kernel-adaptation-n950-n9/blob/mer-n9-2.6.32-20121301/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rm680-video.c > > (search for partial_area) Heh, I was reminded by old colleagues that it was actually my commit back in the day that changed the resolution 864->854 in the stock kernel. And that I did it reluctantly, because there really was no technical reason to do the change. I don't really care all that much either way anymore. I just thought you'd like to get those 4800 pixels back that you've been missing all these years. Plus 864 was nicer to deal with because it has 2^5 as a prime factor while 854 only has 2. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
