On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 01:27:49PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > >>> - What is a HPD interrupt? >> >> hotplug interrupt, fires when you plug in a cable. >> >>> - What is a Type-C DP HPD? >> >> usb type C connector can multiplex both DisplayPort and USB, you need to >> renegotiate the lane splitting every time the sink changes, i.e. on each >> hotplug. > > OK I understand, thanks a lot! > >>> - Again why can't you just use a notifier or function call? >> >> Because windows sucks, hence all that coordination happens through hw >> forwarded interrupts and magic registers. Same horror story on the sound >> side, where the sound driver needs to know what kind of PCM stream the >> monitor can take. It's hilarious. Except when they screw up the design and >> then need to fake parts of it in software. > > So the story is something like that these IRQs have been put into > hardware in order to compensate for flaws in Windows device driver > model, I see. > > If there are such special registers in some hardware I guess I'm all for > implementing some generic quirk in gpiolib for people who need to > software-trigger GPIO IRQs. Could be good for testing too, as there > are such registers in ARMs PL061 GPIO controller for test, just so as > to simulate a GPIO IRQ. > > gpiod_trig_irq() would work with me, I'm happy to support whatever > the GPIO hardware can do usually. > >> In sound we've switched over to a proper sw interface, and we tie the >> different parts (drm graphics driver and alsa snd driver) using the >> component.c framework. > > Hm is that solution or something similar proper for USB connector > as well I wonder... I was thinking about just adding $random_notifier > but maybe that is a bit ugly :/ > >>> What is VPG? Now it seems Intel's internal organization is being used as >>> part of the argument to get this change in and that makes me a bit >>> annoyed. > (...) >> There was chat of usb type C support for forever, but I was always >> promised that we don't need any interactions on the sw side and it's all >> magic in hw. There hasn't been any real design discussions in the open >> source group. VPG is the hw/windows group and generally comes up with >> "interesting" designs not suitable for upstream. >> >> Feel free to just nack this stuff, and please cc intel-gfx/dri-devel in >> the future (since I tend to ignore everything that's not cc'ed to mailing >> lists I don't care about, even when I'm on cc personally). I've added them >> all to cc. > > Thanks a lot Daniel, I understand better now. I'm not really against > adding this "interesting" workaround if that is how Windows works, > we usually have to go by their standards. From the GPIO point > of view it is OK, just something the GPIO can do. I would be more > worried about what the USB PHY maintainer (Felipe) is going to say > about this. Adding Felipe's current address. Considering the new domain part of the address, I'm hopeful we can sort this out. ;) BR, Jani. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
