[Bug 36295] Incorrect rendering in SPECviewperf benchmark

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295

Josà Fonseca <jfonseca@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Product|DRI                         |Mesa
            Version|unspecified                 |git
          Component|DRM/Radeon                  |Mesa core
         AssignedTo|dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |mesa-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                   |.org                        |org
                 CC|                            |brianp@xxxxxxxxxx

--- Comment #2 from Josà Fonseca <jfonseca@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-04-16 02:50:43 PDT ---
This is a bug in SPECviewperf11, which relies on NV_fragment_program2
extension, even when it is not advertised.

Me and Brian have a patch that workarounds this by tolerating
NV_fragment_program2 's IF/ELSE/ENDIF opcodes.

This is exactly the same stratergy that AMD's fglrx drivers took: not advertise
NVIDIA's extension, but silently handle it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux