Hi, On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 09:10:28AM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Hmm there's only so called DMA rotation, which shouldn't work. It's only > meant for really small displays, when the framebuffer is in SRAM. So I'm > a bit baffled as to what rotation you are using and why is it working =). > > There is also VRFB rotation on omap3, but that's not supported by omapdrm. yeah, I was also wondering why it's working. I just did "xrandr -o left" and my display was rotated unexpectedly :) I have not yet checked what happens in that case. > > But yeah, we probably want to change the default > > rotation. Especially since touchscreen should have > > the same default rotation as the screen. (TS is > > horizontal, correct orientation for keyboard usage) > > I don't know much about touchscreens, but I'm guessing that it's easier > to rotate the coordinates from touch than achieve good panel rotation on > N950. Yes, rotating the TS coordinates is simpler than panel rotation, since much less information must be rotated. I just mentioned TS, since the _default_ orientation should be the same for both. In the end both must be rotated at the same time (and thus both must support rotation). -- Sebastian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
