On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 09:02:01PM +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 07:05:59PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > Thought about CCing Linus to show him that 2.6.39-rcX isn't as "calm" > > to everyone, but then chose to CC Maciej instead: Would you be so kind and > > add this to your regression list? Thanks! > > > > Since commit 38f1cff > > > > From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:34:41 +1000 > > Subject: [PATCH] Merge commit '5359533801e3dd3abca5b7d3d985b0b33fd9fe8b' into dr > > > > This commit changed an internal radeon structure, that meant a new driver > > in -next had to be fixed up, merge in the commit and fix up the driver. > > > > Also fixes a trivial nouveau merge. > > > > Conflicts: > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_mem.c > > > > booting my atom/NM10/ION2 system crashes hard during boot, right after > > blanking the screen, and before the initramfs gets loaded. I just > > re-checked: both parent commits ( 5359533 and 4819d2e ) do indeed work > > just fine, but the merge commit ( 38f1cff ) fails, same as tip ( 85f2e68 ). > > Can you activate netconsole and check whether kernel spits anything interesting? > You might try to load nouveau module after boot - maybe something will be saved > to /var/log or you could even ssh into the box and check dmesg... Compiling it as a module seems to work fine. When I do so, no regression is obvious from what gets reported in "dmesg". However, somehow I now do get some output: The last message I see is [drm] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: allocated 1680x1050, fb 0x40.... b0 <some pointer value> Then, nothing more. However, it really is quite strange why this error only appears in the CONFIG_NOUVEAU=y case, not in the =m case... Best, Dominik _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
