On 22 February 2016 at 12:48, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [Cutting down the CC list] > > Hi there, > > Must admit that looking at contributors from chromium.org feels quite > heart warming. > > On 19 February 2016 at 00:50, C Stout <cstout@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Change-Id: I6c891515d93a6f1a597e762090c3530a6810c6c6 >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a4xx_gpu.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----- >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c | 8 ++++++ >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c | 3 ++- >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h | 5 ++++ >> 4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> > > Please include your fill name and a signed-off-by as mentioned in the > documentation [1]. Without those the maintainer/Rob C cannot pick your > work. > > While you're there you can nuke the Change-id tag - they're normally > frowned upon by kernel developers although Rob might be ok keeping > them. Please add a line or two of commit message. Some examples/ideas > - what are the differences wrt the 420 devices and/or how you noticed > them (official documentation, reverse engineering). what's missing to > get the devices fully working, how it's been tested, etc. > Completely forgot: prefix the patches based on the subsystem used. Otherwise it's more likely that the maintainer email filter will miss them. Thinking about "drm/msm: add support for adreno 430" although git log is your friend. Regards, Emil _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel