Re: [PATCH 0/3] drm: more pre-decrement fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Christian König
<deathsimple@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am 15.02.2016 um 19:41 schrieb Rasmus Villemoes:
>>
>> A few more cases where one should use post-decrement when unwinding,
>> this time found where the unwinding is done inside the setup loop
>> instead of after an error label.
>
>
> Patch 1 and 3 are Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>.

Patches 1 and 3 applied.  thanks!

Alex

>
> Nice catch,
> Christian.
>
>>
>> Rasmus Villemoes (3):
>>    drm/amdgpu: use post-decrement in error handling
>>    drm/nouveau: use post-decrement in error handling
>>    drm/radeon: use post-decrement in error handling
>>
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 2 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c    | 2 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c     | 2 +-
>>   3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux