Unless I oversaw something nothing was silently ignored. I believe I
responded to each of your comments (and comments by others), those I
agreed with I implemented, those I didn't agree with I didn't implement.
-- Ilija
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Däer wrote:
On Fre, 2011-03-18 at 16:58 -0500, Ilija Hadzic wrote:
This patch extends the interface to drm_wait_vblank ioctl so that crtc>1
can be represented. It also adds a new capability to drm_getcap ioctl so
that the user space can check whether the new interface to drm_wait_vblank
is supported (and fall back to the legacy interface if not)
[...]
You seem to have silently ignored my previous concerns and suggestions
about the handling of the high CRTC mask/shift.
@@ -753,6 +755,7 @@ struct drm_event_vblank {
};
#define DRM_CAP_DUMB_BUFFER 0x1
+#define DRM_CAP_HIGH_CRTC 0x2
Seems like a rather generic name, something like
DRM_CAP_VBLANK_HIGH_CRTC might be better.
--
Earthling Michel DÃnzer | http://www.vmware.com
Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
