[Bug 34493] r600g performance regression introduced by 467023e8 (Marek Olšák: r600g: use the same upload buffer for vertices, indices, and constants)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34493

--- Comment #5 from Marek OlÅÃk <maraeo@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-03-01 17:19:14 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > There will be more performance improvements soon. I know how to improve it by
> > 50% or more, it's just not very high on my priority list currently.
> 
> Oh!  Well, thank you for that (in advance)!
> 
> My purpose in testing for regressions was to find a way to contribute back to
> the community.  Since I am not (yet) able to write code, or properly debug
> code, I thought I could at least report changes in performance and/or behavior
> in the build systems.  I'm getting the vibe that reporting performance
> regressions is not deemed a meaningful way to contribute.  Is that correct?

It's very useful to report performance regressions. Just in this case, it's not
obvious to me what's wrong with the commit. There are not many developers, so
it might be hard to get attention quickly especially if it's not a
show-stopper, but developers usually read bug reports and, thanks to that, are
aware of existing issues.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux