Hi, On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 03:20:15AM +0100, Indan Zupancic wrote: > Sorry, I plainly forgot to mention that. I'm on my Thinkpad X40 with gen 2 > hardware, 855GM. Ah, craptastic i855gm. Is this with the HIC poke patch? <snip> > > I've created two quick patches to check a few theories, please test them > > (both patches independently and both together). Patches attached. > > Tried with both applied, doesn't change anything. Well, these two patches completely undo the patch by Chris Wilson (and I've re-reviewed it to check whether there are any other hidden bugs in it). I suspect that your bisect went wrong because the range a00b10c360b35d6431a94cb..5e78330126e23e00950 is known to be broken on your hw. Could you recheck these two endpoints to confirm that breakage was introduce in that range? If so, could you rebase this range and squash the three patches by me you've mentioned in the original report into the patch by Chris and re-run git bisect on this new branch? Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel@xxxxxxxx Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
