Re: [git pull] drm fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2011/2/18 Anca Emanuel <anca.emanuel@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Nouveau OpenGL regresion
>
> Tools used: http://packages.ubuntu.com/maverick/misc/glmark2
>
> With 2.6.38-rc5 latest git:
> nv50_screen_get_param:162 - ÂUnknown PIPE_CAP 11
> ===================================================
> Â Âglmark2 10.07.1
> ===================================================
> Â ÂOpenGL Information
> Â ÂGL_VENDOR: Â Â nouveau
> Â ÂGL_RENDERER: Â Gallium 0.4 on NV92
> Â ÂGL_VERSION: Â Â2.1 Mesa 7.9-devel
> ===================================================
> Precompilation
>  ÂVertex array         ÂFPS: 105
>  ÂVertex buffer object     ÂFPS: 267
> Texture filtering
>  ÂNearest            FPS: 295
>  ÂLinear            ÂFPS: 299
>  ÂMipmapped           FPS: 308
> Shading
>  ÂGLSL per vertex lighting   ÂFPS: 227
>  ÂGLSL per pixel lighting    FPS: 260
> ===================================================
> Your glmark2 Score is 727 Â^_^
> ===================================================
>
>
> With Linux ubuntu 2.6.35-25-generic #44-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 21 17:40:44
> UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux:
>
> nv50_screen_get_param:162 - ÂUnknown PIPE_CAP 11
> ===================================================
> Â Âglmark2 10.07.1
> ===================================================
> Â ÂOpenGL Information
> Â ÂGL_VENDOR: Â Â nouveau
> Â ÂGL_RENDERER: Â Gallium 0.4 on NV92
> Â ÂGL_VERSION: Â Â2.1 Mesa 7.9-devel
> ===================================================
> Precompilation
>  ÂVertex array         ÂFPS: 265
>  ÂVertex buffer object     ÂFPS: 599
> Texture filtering
>  ÂNearest            FPS: 687
>  ÂLinear            ÂFPS: 683
>  ÂMipmapped           FPS: 717
> Shading
>  ÂGLSL per vertex lighting   ÂFPS: 480
>  ÂGLSL per pixel lighting    FPS: 524
> ===================================================
> Your glmark2 Score is 1628 Â^_^
> ===================================================

You're yelling in thread about recent single drm fixes... and you
compare 2.6.35 with 2.6.38-rc5. What is possibility it's regression
introduced by one of that few commits?

Please report on bugzilla normally, perform bisecting, but do not
report such a things in unrelated places!

-- 
RafaÅ
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux