On 11-02-11 06:21 AM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: > On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Corbin Simpson > <mostawesomedude@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 6:49 AM, James Simmons <jsimmons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> I was looking at the radeon support state in libkms and I found out the >>>> following patch was proposed back in September, but never commented nor >>>> merged. The patch was submitted by nobled. >>>> >>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2010-September/003740.html >>>> >>>> I applied it on the latest drm git version without any problem and >>>> compilation looks fine. Is there a reason preventing it from being merged? >>>> >>>> If it needs testing, make your suggestion, I'll gladly make my best to >>>> test it. >>> Good point. Is KMS dead? Anyone? >> I was seriously hoping that Dave's dumb buffer API would go upstream >> and that libkms would be able to use that generic path for all KMS >> drivers, rather than needing shim code for every driver it supports. >> >> That said, yeah, the libkms maintainer probably should pull that code >> in. Who is that, anyway? >> >> ~ C. > That would probably be me. > > The "core" libkms changes are rb/acked and the radeon changes looks > good so just go ahead and commit them anyways. Nobled do you have > commit access to the drm repo? > > Cheers Jakob. I don't think Nobled has commit access. But to be sure, I'm adding it to the conversation. ;) -- Alexandre Demers _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
