On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:27:09 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > victory is mine! ok, that premature return seems to have solved it,
> > i'm up and running under this new kernel. are we getting close?
>
> Not even close. We just disabled functionality that was working in 2.6.37;
> the interaction between ACPI and gfx. What a shame.
>
> Instead of return -ENOTSUPP at the start,
> you can return 0 before each of the if (mboxes & MBOX_*) to narrow down
> which function regressed.
ok, i'll see how much of that i can get to today. but at this
point, are we fairly convinced that there *is* a problem? i'd hate to
go through all this, only to learn at the end that it's something
stupid i did. it seems odd that no one else has mentioned running
into this -- have you heard no other reports?
so, before i launch into this, is there anything else i might report
about my system and its current setup that someone might want to know?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
