On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 01:35:49 +0100 (CET), "Indan Zupancic" <indan@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Yeah, the second patch is a bit of a desperate attempt because Larry reported that
> it didn't fix his problem.
>
> About your patch, you still do:
>
> +void intel_panel_setup_backlight(struct drm_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> +
> + dev_priv->backlight_level = intel_panel_get_max_backlight(dev);
> + dev_priv->backlight_enabled = dev_priv->backlight_level != 0;
> +}
>
> While my patch changes that to:
>
> + u32 level;
>
> - if (dev_priv->backlight_level == 0)
> - dev_priv->backlight_level = intel_panel_get_max_backlight(dev);
> + if (dev_priv->backlight_level == 0) {
> + level = intel_panel_get_backlight(dev);
> + if (level == 0)
> + level = intel_panel_get_max_backlight(dev);
> + dev_priv->backlight_level = level;
> + }
>
> Your patch uses intel_panel_get_max_backlight() to check if the backlight is
> enabled. Is this always correct, or may it cause bugs in the future?
That was a typo, cut'n'pasting the line from above.
> Anyway, my main concern with unconditionally setting the backlight level to
> the maximum is that any stored brightness level (by the BIOS or whatever) may
> be lost, and that the screen is set to maximum brightness at each boot. This
> is certainly the behaviour I've seen with an unpatched kernel. So I propose to
> do what my patch does and set it to intel_panel_get_backlight(dev) if that
> returns non-zero. Something like this:
Sure, s/intel_panel_get_max_backlight/intel_panel_get_backlight/ and we
get the behaviour we both want - preserving the current backlight unless
none is set.
> While I'm glad this problem is being fixed upstream, it would be nice to get
> some credit for finding the source of the problem.
Sorry. You found the bug but I felt your rationale was off. However, I was
amiss in not giving you the credit you fully deserved.
-Chris
commit 9c1c388a53e5df8819e898106a64e34d0994a5d4
Author: Indan Zupancic <indan@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed Jan 12 11:59:19 2011 +0000
drm/i915/panel: The backlight is enabled if the current value is non-zero
... and not if the maximum is non-zero. This fixes the typo introduced
in 47356eb6728501452 and preserves the backlight value from boot.
[ickle: My thanks also to Indan Zupancic for diagnosing the original
regression and suggesting the appropriate fix.]
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx # after 47356eb6728501452
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pan
index e00d200..27c79c7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
@@ -278,6 +278,6 @@ void intel_panel_setup_backlight(struct drm_device
*dev)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
- dev_priv->backlight_level = intel_panel_get_max_backlight(dev);
+ dev_priv->backlight_level = intel_panel_max_backlight(dev);
dev_priv->backlight_enabled = dev_priv->backlight_level != 0;
}
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
