On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 19:21 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > With cmwq, there's no reason for radeon to use a dedicated workqueue. > > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead. > > > > Because radeon_driver_irq_uninstall_kms() may be called from > > unsleepable context, the work items can't be flushed from there. > > Instead, init and flush from radeon_irq_kms_init/fini(). > > > > While at it, simplify canceling/flushing of rdev->pm.dynpm_idle_work. > > Always initialize and sync cancel instead of being unnecessarily smart > > about it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx> > > Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > --- > > Only compile tested. Please feel free to take it into the subsystem > > tree or simply ack - I'll route it through the wq tree. > > Patch looks good to me. I'm not sure what's the best way to send this > upstream. I'm working on some irq changes in the same area now, so > I'd prefer if we pushed it through Dave's tree, but I can handle it > either way. I'll pull it into my tree for merging to Linus. Dave. > > Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx> > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
