Re: [patch -next] nouveua: sizeof() vs ARRAY_SIZE()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 12:26 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> ARRAY_SIZE() was intended here, sizeof() is too large.
Thanks, I've queued this patch.

Ben.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_vram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_vram.c
> index 47489ed..58e98ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_vram.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_vram.c
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ nv50_vram_flags_valid(struct drm_device *dev, u32 tile_flags)
>  {
>  	int type = (tile_flags & NOUVEAU_GEM_TILE_LAYOUT_MASK) >> 8;
>  
> -	if (likely(type < sizeof(types) && types[type]))
> +	if (likely(type < ARRAY_SIZE(types) && types[type]))
>  		return true;
>  	return false;
>  }


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux