On 2010-11-21 09:45 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Yes, I'd be ok with UDF doing a "select BKL" along with a "default n" > for BKL itself. > > I think UDF currently is the only sane reason to have BKL enabled any > more, and yes, it would probably make it easier to configure things. UFS (which I use) also relies on BKL. -- Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/) _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
