On Fre, 2010-11-19 at 16:34 -0500, jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Forbid allocating buffer bigger than visible VRAM or GTT, also
> properly set lpfn field.
>
> v2 - use max macro
> - silence warning
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
> index 1d06774..c2fa64c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
> @@ -69,18 +69,28 @@ void radeon_ttm_placement_from_domain(struct radeon_bo *rbo, u32 domain)
> u32 c = 0;
>
> rbo->placement.fpfn = 0;
> - rbo->placement.lpfn = rbo->rdev->mc.active_vram_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + rbo->placement.lpfn = 0;
> rbo->placement.placement = rbo->placements;
> rbo->placement.busy_placement = rbo->placements;
> - if (domain & RADEON_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM)
> + if (domain & RADEON_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM) {
> + rbo->placement.lpfn = max((unsigned)rbo->placement.lpfn, (unsigned)rbo->rdev->mc.active_vram_size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> rbo->placements[c++] = TTM_PL_FLAG_WC | TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED |
> TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM;
> - if (domain & RADEON_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT)
> + }
> + if (domain & RADEON_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT) {
> + rbo->placement.lpfn = max((unsigned)rbo->placement.lpfn, (unsigned)rbo->rdev->mc.gtt_size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> rbo->placements[c++] = TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING | TTM_PL_FLAG_TT;
> - if (domain & RADEON_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU)
> + }
> + if (domain & RADEON_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU) {
> + /* 4G limit for CPU domain */
> + rbo->placement.lpfn = max(rbo->placement.lpfn, 0xFFFFFFFF >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> rbo->placements[c++] = TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING | TTM_PL_FLAG_SYSTEM;
> - if (!c)
> + }
> + if (!c) {
> + /* 4G limit for CPU domain */
> + rbo->placement.lpfn = max(rbo->placement.lpfn, 0xFFFFFFFF >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> rbo->placements[c++] = TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING | TTM_PL_FLAG_SYSTEM;
> + }
I don't think taxing the maximum is the right thing to do: If domain is
(RADEON_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM | RADEON_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT) and VRAM doesn't happen
to be the same size as GTT, lpfn will end up larger than one of them.
AFAICT radeon_ttm_placement_from_domain() should just set lpfn to 0
(i.e. unrestricted), the callers that need it to be non-0 already set it
afterwards.
Out of curiosity, where does the 4G limit come from?
> @@ -104,6 +115,17 @@ int radeon_bo_create(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct drm_gem_object *gobj,
> }
> *bo_ptr = NULL;
>
> + /* maximun bo size is the minimun btw visible vram and gtt size */
> + max_size = rdev->mc.visible_vram_size;
> + if (max_size > rdev->mc.gtt_size) {
> + max_size = rdev->mc.gtt_size;
> + }
max_size = min(rdev->mc.visible_vram_size, rdev->mc.gtt_size);
Except I think this should actually be max(...).
> + if ((page_align << PAGE_SHIFT) >= max_size) {
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "%s:%d alloc size %ldM bigger than %ldMb limit\n",
> + __func__, __LINE__, page_align >> (20 - PAGE_SHIFT), max_size >> 20);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
Maybe this should be rate-limited, or userspace can spam dmesg.
--
Earthling Michel DÃnzer | http://www.vmware.com
Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
