On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:40:14PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > >Hence I think that drivers with extremely specific needs should roll their > >own allocator. So I don't think we should anticipate different allocator > >algorithms. I see driver-specific stuff more in the area of clever > >eviction algorithms - i915 is currently at 5 lru's for gtt mapped bos, and > >we're still adding. > > > > > > Yes, I agree. My point was merely that one should think twice before > embedding > drm_mm objects in generic buffer objects intended also for drivers > with special needs. Ok, I see. Looks like I've slightly shot over the mark here ;-) As I've said, I don't have any immediate plans to create havoc in ttm. And if I start doing so, I'll do it in (hopefully) incrementally useful steps. > Thanks, > Thomas Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel@xxxxxxxx Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
