On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 08:14 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:57 -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > So we are facing a deadlock with the radeon cs ioctl. When a buffer is given > > a name (with flink) we could endup with 2 handle pointing to the same > > object (flink object and open it from same file descriptor). Would it be ok > > if i change gem open to first look if we already have an handle for the > > object and to use that handle instead of creating a new one ? Or could > > this break intel driver ? > > I think r300g worked around this already, maybe we should just avoid > doing it from userspace if possible. We had this in nouveau at some point. In the end, I prevented the deadlock from occuring by checking that a process doesn't reserve the same buffer twice (we store file_priv in a reserved_by field in the bo as we reserve the buffers), and then just fixed userspace. Ben. > > Dave. > > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
