On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 19:36:26 -0700, Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Cancel the output polling work proc before acquiring the struct mutex > to avoid acquiring the work proc mutex with the struct mutex > held. This avoids inverting the lock order seen when the work proc > runs. I thought this was part of Daniel's reordering to avoid race conditions between interrupts and module unload. Fortunately not. The lack of locking during hotplug is worrisome should we ever do dynamic connectors. Applied to -next. Now you also said that we have memory corruption after unload... :( Thanks, -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
