On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Jerome Glisse <glisse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/13/2010 12:48 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: >> Initialize nsamples to 1 in case userspace does not emit >> PA_SC_AA_CONFIG. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Andre Maasikas <amaasikas@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c | 1 + >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c >> index 8e165b2..b03f93b 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c >> @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ static void r600_cs_track_init(struct r600_cs_track *track) >> track->db_depth_size = 0xFFFFFFFF; >> track->db_depth_size_idx = 0; >> track->db_depth_control = 0xFFFFFFFF; >> + track->nsamples = 1; >> } >> >> static inline int r600_cs_track_validate_cb(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, int i) > > I would NAK this one, accepting such things pretty much defeat the idea > of checker, i think userspace should always set nsamples as otherwise it > might trick kernel and overwritte others memory. ie: > cs1 set nsample 8 & all others properly so cs1 is accepted > cs2 don't set nsample but bind a smaller bo and so can overwritte others > buffer Unfortunately, existing userspace already sends buffers without this reg set. It's just that prior to tiling we didn't care what it was set to. Alex _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
