Re: Suspend lockup: How to bisect d-r-t specific commits?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/7/26 Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx>:
> W dniu 26 lipca 2010 20:55 użytkownik Alex Deucher
> <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx> napisał:
>> 2010/7/26 Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>> W dniu 26 lipca 2010 07:57 użytkownik Alex Deucher
>>> <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx> napisał:
>>>> How about v4 (attached)?  Any better?
>>>
>>> I counted up to 9 flashes after resume this time. Didn't try this
>>> again (maybe different amount of flashses).
>>
>> I've broken it down into 6 patches available here:
>> http://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/reduce_emit/
>
> Thanks for this splitting your patch!
>
> I got lock up after applying 0001 and 0002. I fixed it with attached
> half-revert-patch. Didn't experiment with 0003 - 0006 yet.

Weird we shouldn't need the sampler state as we emit that later based
on the source surface we are copying.  Can you try with all patches
both with and without the sampler emit put back?

Alex
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux