Re: [PATCH ati] Add Gallium (radeong) support via an xorg.conf option, disabled by default.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 20:19 -0400, Robert Hooker wrote: 
> The r300 gallium driver in mesa is built as radeong_dri.so and the DDX is
> hardcoded to use r300 as the DRI driver name for that generation. this patch
> allows radeong to be used if specified in an xorg.conf with this option:
> 
> Option "Gallium" "True"
> 
> This only affects DRI2 since the gallium driver requires it, and has the benefit
> of being able to coexist with the classic mesa driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Hooker <sarvatt@xxxxxxxxxx>

See http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27328#c1 :

        IMHO xorg.conf would be both overkill and insufficient: the
        r300g binary should just be called what it is, namely
        r300_dri.so, and then the distro could choose the default via
        the installation path / symlinks / whatever, and the user could
        override it per application via $LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer           |                http://www.vmware.com
Libre software enthusiast         |          Debian, X and DRI developer
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux