On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 11:00:51AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So please. Just make me a tree that has regression fixes _only_. I'm not > AT ALL interested in "it is useful to report the gpu temp". If it was so > useful, and if it was ready before the merge window, it should hav gone in > then. That clearly wasn't the case, so it's not going in now either. Ho-hum... Speaking of which, what about leak fixes? There's a long-standing in-core inode leak in jffs2; basically, if you fail directory modification in symlink() et.al., you get a leaked inode and whinge at umount. Found after -rc1, had been there since all the way back (similar bug in creat() had been fixed in 2003, mkdir()/mknod()/symlink() were not). Fix sits in jffs2-fixes now... I can simply pull jffs2-fixes into vfs for-next (I need it in there for ->evict_inode() series), but I'd obviously prefer to just rebase it after it gets into mainline. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
