Hi Linus, On Fri, 21 May 2010 11:56:39 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I suspect we should have some "new warnings are errors" thing for > linux-next, so that people can't do this. I do attempt to report new warnings but they are often hard to spot among all the "may be used uninitialised" rubbish of an X86_64 allmodconfig build. Also, sometimes people ignore me, of course. :-( That being said, I did not get the mentioned warning for either an i386 or x86_64 allmodconfig build - I wonder why not? Compiler differences? Config differences? (See http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/2617918/ and http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/2617928/). Ah, I did get it for an i386 defconfig build (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/2617930/). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpzABUEhLhzd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
