On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 15:01 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> not sure about the kernel-parameters additions, since the option would >> be drm.edid_threshhold= and its a module option, though now that we >> can accept module options on the command line, we could start adding >> them to parameters file. However you'd need to add the drm. bit to the >> front of the option. > > The doc already kind of mentions that, but it's kind of wrong. It only > talks about "passing options with modprobe" and "passing options to > built-in modules on kcmdline", but not about "passing options to > loadable modules on kcmdline". I'll follow up on that to lkml. > >> How much broken hw we seeing that this fixes? maybe some bug >> references, as I hate having special options that people have to know >> just to see somehting on screen. > > I've seen at least two cases in bug reports. I could dig up a reference > I suppose. > > That's a valid point though: we currently don't distinguish between > "connected but with broken EDID" and "disconnected". I think it sounds > reasonable to treat the former as connector_status_unknown instead. > That way, if nothing else is connected, X will still light you up at the > fallback size. Sound right? > Or maybe just mention the EDID is bad and may cause problems, but then use as much of it as possible. That has the best chance of a satisfied user and a native mode being selected. Alex > - ajax > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel > > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel