On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 02:09:14PM +0530, Vaishnav Achath wrote:
> J722S/AM67 uses the same BCDMA CSIRX IP as AM62A, but it supports
> TX channels as well in addition to RX.
This doesn't make sense. You say that the am62a doesn't have a tx
channel ("but it supports TX as well") but then modify the struct for
the am62a to add a tx channel. Does that not break things on the am62a?
> Add the BCDMA TCHAN information
> in the am62a_dmss_csi_soc_data so as to support all the platforms in the
> family with same compatible. UDMA_CAP2_TCHAN_CNT indicates the presence
> of TX channels and it will be 0 for platforms without TX support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@xxxxxx>
> ---
>
> CSI2RX capture test results on J722S EVM with IMX219:
> https://gist.github.com/vaishnavachath/e2eaed62ee8f53428ee9b830aaa02cc3
>
> drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
> index b3f27b3f9209..4130f50979d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
> @@ -4340,6 +4340,8 @@ static struct udma_match_data j721e_mcu_data = {
>
> static struct udma_soc_data am62a_dmss_csi_soc_data = {
> .oes = {
> + .bcdma_tchan_data = 0x800,
> + .bcdma_tchan_ring = 0xa00,
> .bcdma_rchan_data = 0xe00,
> .bcdma_rchan_ring = 0x1000,
> },
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
