On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 06:14:10PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
>
> To i.MX9, there is no valid fsl_edma->txirq/errirq, so add a check in
> fsl_edma_irq_exit to avoid issues.
>
> Fixes: 44eb827264de ("dmaengine: fsl-edma: request per-channel IRQ only when channel is allocated")
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/dma/fsl-edma-main.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-main.c b/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-main.c
> index 01bd5cb24a49..89c54eeb4925 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-main.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-main.c
> @@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ fsl_edma2_irq_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>
> /* The last IRQ is for eDMA err */
> if (i == count - 1) {
> + fsl_edma->errirq = irq;
> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> fsl_edma_err_handler,
> 0, "eDMA2-ERR", fsl_edma);
> @@ -322,10 +323,13 @@ static void fsl_edma_irq_exit(
> struct platform_device *pdev, struct fsl_edma_engine *fsl_edma)
> {
> if (fsl_edma->txirq == fsl_edma->errirq) {
> - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, fsl_edma->txirq, fsl_edma);
> + if (fsl_edma->txirq >= 0)
> + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, fsl_edma->txirq, fsl_edma);
> } else {
> - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, fsl_edma->txirq, fsl_edma);
> - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, fsl_edma->errirq, fsl_edma);
> + if (fsl_edma->txirq >= 0)
> + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, fsl_edma->txirq, fsl_edma);
> + if (fsl_edma->errirq >= 0)
> + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, fsl_edma->errirq, fsl_edma);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -485,6 +489,8 @@ static int fsl_edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!fsl_edma)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + fsl_edma->errirq = -EINVAL;
> + fsl_edma->txirq = -EINVAL;
why not use 0 as invalidate?
Frank
> fsl_edma->drvdata = drvdata;
> fsl_edma->n_chans = chans;
> mutex_init(&fsl_edma->fsl_edma_mutex);
> --
> 2.37.1
>
