Re: [PATCH v2 14/16] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: enable bam pipe locking/unlocking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 02:27:23PM GMT, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
> enable bam pipe locking/unlocking for ipq9507 SoC.

Note that the commit messages for the other non-dts commits will not
show up in the git history for this file. So, please follow
https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#describe-your-changes
and give some indication of "problem description", to give future
readers an idea why this is here.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> Change in [v2]
> 
> * enabled locking/unlocking support for ipq9574
> 
> Change in [v1]
> 
> * This patch was not included in [v1]
> 
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
> index 48dfafea46a7..dacaec62ec39 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
> @@ -262,6 +262,7 @@ cryptobam: dma-controller@704000 {
>  			#dma-cells = <1>;
>  			qcom,ee = <1>;
>  			qcom,controlled-remotely;
> +			qcom,bam_pipe_lock;

Per the question before about what does this actually lock. Is this a
property of the BAM controller, or the crypto channel?

Regards,
Bjorn

>  		};
>  
>  		crypto: crypto@73a000 {
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux