Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: dma: fsl,imx-dma: Convert to dtschema

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 3:49 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 31/05/2024 11:04, Animesh Agarwal wrote:
> > +  "#dma-cells":
> > +    const: 1
> > +
> > +  dma-channels:
> > +    maximum: 16
>
> maximum or const?

The txt binding says it should always be 16. Datasheet says this
device has 16 channels of DMA services. I thought specifying just the
maximum implies maximum=minimum=16. Sorry for missing the changelog in
this version it was cost in the v1 of this patch.

>
> deprecated: true
>

Shall it not be
"#dma-channels ":
  deprecated: true
?

> > +
> > +  dma-requests:
> > +    description: Number of DMA requests supported.
>
> deprecated: true
>

Shall it not be
"#dma-requests ":
  deprecated: true
?

> > +
> > +required:
> > +  - compatible
> > +  - reg
> > +  - interrupts
> > +  - "#dma-cells"
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > +  - |
> > +    dma-controller@10001000 {
> > +      compatible = "fsl,imx27-dma";
> > +      reg = <0x10001000 0x1000>;
> > +      interrupts = <32 33>;
> > +      #dma-cells = <1>;
> > +      dma-channels = <16>;
>
> and drop it from here

Is this really a deprecated property?





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux