Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: mxs-dma: Add check for dma_set_max_seg_size()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 10:32:05PM +0800, Ma Ke wrote:
> To avoid the failure of dma_set_max_seg_size(), we should check the
> return value of the dma_set_max_seg_size().

Check return value of dma_set_max_seg_size() in case it return error.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make_ruc2021@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c b/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c
> index cfb9962417ef..90cbb9b04b02 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c
> @@ -798,7 +798,9 @@ static int mxs_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	mxs_dma->dma_device.dev = &pdev->dev;
>  
>  	/* mxs_dma gets 65535 bytes maximum sg size */
> -	dma_set_max_seg_size(mxs_dma->dma_device.dev, MAX_XFER_BYTES);
> +	ret = dma_set_max_seg_size(mxs_dma->dma_device.dev, MAX_XFER_BYTES);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

How error happen? 

static inline int dma_set_max_seg_size(struct device *dev, unsigned int size)
{
	if (dev->dma_parms) {
		dev->dma_parms->max_segment_size = size;
		return 0;
	}
	return -EIO;
}

Only possible dev->dma_parms is null. but mxs-dma is platform device, it
point to platform's dma_parms field. Look like impossible it is null.

Frank 



>  
>  	mxs_dma->dma_device.device_alloc_chan_resources = mxs_dma_alloc_chan_resources;
>  	mxs_dma->dma_device.device_free_chan_resources = mxs_dma_free_chan_resources;
> -- 
> 2.37.2
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux