On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 2:49 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > No need to rewrite the value, instead use 'else' branch. > This will also help further refactoring the code later on. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c | 9 ++++----- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c > index bd305fa87093..1986b3386307 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c > @@ -1643,11 +1643,10 @@ struct iio_dev *iio_device_alloc(struct device *parent, int sizeof_priv) > struct iio_dev *indio_dev; > size_t alloc_size; > > - alloc_size = sizeof(struct iio_dev_opaque); > - if (sizeof_priv) { > - alloc_size = ALIGN(alloc_size, IIO_DMA_MINALIGN); > - alloc_size += sizeof_priv; > - } > + if (sizeof_priv) > + alloc_size = ALIGN(alloc_size, IIO_DMA_MINALIGN) + sizeof_priv; Isn't this using alloc_size before it is assigned? Perhaps you meant this: alloc_size = ALIGN(sizeof(struct iio_dev_opaque), IIO_DMA_MINALIGN) + sizeof_priv; > + else > + alloc_size = sizeof(struct iio_dev_opaque); > > iio_dev_opaque = kzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL); > if (!iio_dev_opaque)