[PATCH 1/1] dmaengine: fix is_slave_direction() return false when DMA_DEV_TO_DEV

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



is_slave_direction() should return true when direction is DMA_DEV_TO_DEV.

Fixes: 49920bc66984 ("dmaengine: add new enum dma_transfer_direction")
Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/dmaengine.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
index 3df70d6131c8f..752dbde4cec1f 100644
--- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
+++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
@@ -953,7 +953,8 @@ static inline int dmaengine_slave_config(struct dma_chan *chan,
 
 static inline bool is_slave_direction(enum dma_transfer_direction direction)
 {
-	return (direction == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) || (direction == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
+	return (direction == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) || (direction == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) ||
+	       (direction == DMA_DEV_TO_DEV);
 }
 
 static inline struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *dmaengine_prep_slave_single(
-- 
2.34.1





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux