Re: [PATCH v2] dmaengine: idxd: Convert spinlock to mutex to lock evl workqueue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23-12-23, 14:06, Rex Zhang wrote:
> The drain_workqueue() is not in a locked context. In the multi-task case,
> it's possible to call queue_work() when drain_workqueue() is ongoing, then
> it can cause Call Trace due to pushing a work into a draining workqueue:
>     Call Trace:
>     <TASK>
>     ? __warn+0x7d/0x140
>     ? __queue_work+0x2b2/0x440
>     ? report_bug+0x1f8/0x200
>     ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70
>     ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x70
>     ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
>     ? __queue_work+0x2b2/0x440
>     queue_work_on+0x28/0x30
>     idxd_misc_thread+0x303/0x5a0 [idxd]
>     ? __schedule+0x369/0xb40
>     ? __pfx_irq_thread_fn+0x10/0x10
>     ? irq_thread+0xbc/0x1b0
>     irq_thread_fn+0x21/0x70
>     irq_thread+0x102/0x1b0
>     ? preempt_count_add+0x74/0xa0
>     ? __pfx_irq_thread_dtor+0x10/0x10
>     ? __pfx_irq_thread+0x10/0x10
>     kthread+0x103/0x140
>     ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
>     ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50
>     ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
>     ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
>     </TASK>
> The original lock for event log was spinlock, drain_workqueue() can't
> be in a spinlocked context because it may cause task rescheduling. The
> spinlock was called in thread and irq thread context, the current usages
> does not require a spinlock for event log, so it's feasible to convert
> spinlock to mutex.
> For putting drain_workqueue() into a locked context, convert the spinlock
> to mutex, then lock drain_workqueue() by mutex.

This fails to apply for me, pls rebase

-- 
~Vinod




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux