On 09/11/2023 22:20, Frank Li wrote: > In i.MX95's edma version 5, the TCD structure is extended to support 64-bit > addresses for fields like saddr and daddr. To prevent code duplication, > employ help macros to handle the fields, as the field names remain the same > between TCD and TCD64. > > Change local variables related to TCD addresses from 'u32' to 'dma_addr_t' > to accept 64-bit DMA addresses. > > Change 'vtcd' type to 'void *' to avoid direct use. Use helper macros to > access the TCD fields correctly. > > Call 'dma_set_mask_and_coherent(64)' when TCD64 is supported. > > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx> > --- Three kbuild reports with build failures. I have impression this was never build-tested and reviewed internally before posting. We had such talk ~month ago and I insisted on some internal review prior submitting to mailing list. I did not insist on internal building of patches, because it felt obvious, so please kindly thoroughly build, review and test your patches internally, before using the community for this. I am pretty sure NXP can build the code they send. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Krzysztof
