Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] dt-bindings: document generic access controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 9/29/23 17:35, Rob Herring wrote:

On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 16:28:42 +0200, Gatien Chevallier wrote:
From: Oleksii Moisieiev <Oleksii_Moisieiev@xxxxxxxx>

Introducing of the generic access controller bindings for the
access controller provider and consumer devices. Those bindings are
intended to allow a better handling of accesses to resources in a
hardware architecture supporting several compartments.

This patch is based on [1]. It is integrated in this patchset as it
provides a use-case for it.

Diffs with [1]:
	- Rename feature-domain* properties to access-control* to narrow
	  down the scope of the binding
	- YAML errors and typos corrected.
	- Example updated
	- Some rephrasing in the binding description

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0c0a82bb-18ae-d057-562b

Signed-off-by: Oleksii Moisieiev <oleksii_moisieiev@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@xxxxxxxxxxx>

---
Changes in V5:
	- Diffs with [1]
	- Discarded the [IGNORE] tag as the patch is now part of the
	  patchset

  .../access-controllers/access-controller.yaml | 90 +++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/access-controllers/access-controller.yaml


My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):

yamllint warnings/errors:

dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
/builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/access-controllers/access-controller.yaml: access-control-provider: missing type definition

doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):

See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20230929142852.578394-2-gatien.chevallier@xxxxxxxxxxx

The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
should be noted in *this* patch.

If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
date:

pip3 install dtschema --upgrade

Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note
that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking
your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.


Hi Rob,

Running:
1- make dt_binding_check | grep access-control
2- make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/access-controllers/access-controller.yaml
from Krzysztof's slideset

with

pip3 show dtschema
Name: dtschema
Version: 2023.9

and

pip3 show yamllint
Name: yamllint
Version: 1.32.0

I don't see any of the errors reported by the robot. I have to clone
your repository to reproduce it.

Should I resubmit with a clean dt-check using the latest dtschema?

***********
However, I get:
warning: ignoring duplicate '$id' value 'http://devicetree.org/schemas/reserved-memory/framebuffer.yaml# warning: ignoring duplicate '$id' value 'http://devicetree.org/schemas/reserved-memory/memory-region.yaml# warning: ignoring duplicate '$id' value 'http://devicetree.org/schemas/reserved-memory/shared-dma-pool.yaml# warning: ignoring duplicate '$id' value 'http://devicetree.org/schemas/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.yaml

Above warnings disappears when switching to:
pip3 show dtschema
Name: dtschema
Version: 2023.7

The above YAMLs seem to be duplicated in dtschema's latest version.
I guess it's a synchro that needs to be done since:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230830231758.2561402-2-sjg@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
***********

Best regards,
Gatien



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux