Re: [PATCH V6 1/1] dmaengine: amd: qdma: Add AMD QDMA driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 29/09/2023 à 19:24, Lizhi Hou a écrit :
From: Nishad Saraf <nishads@xxxxxxx>

Adds driver to enable PCIe board which uses AMD QDMA (the Queue-based
Direct Memory Access) subsystem. For example, Xilinx Alveo V70 AI
Accelerator devices.
     https://www.xilinx.com/applications/data-center/v70.html

The QDMA subsystem is used in conjunction with the PCI Express IP block
to provide high performance data transfer between host memory and the
card's DMA subsystem.


...

+static int amd_qdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct qdma_platdata *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
+	struct qdma_device *qdev;
+	struct resource *res;
+	void __iomem *regs;
+	int ret;
+
+	qdev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*qdev), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!qdev)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, qdev);
+	qdev->pdev = pdev;
+	mutex_init(&qdev->ctxt_lock);

If this was done later, it could simplify some error handling below.

+
+	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
+	if (!res) {
+		qdma_err(qdev, "Failed to get IRQ resource");
+		ret = -ENODEV;
+		goto failed;
+	}
+	qdev->err_irq_idx = pdata->irq_index;
+	qdev->queue_irq_start = res->start + 1;
+	qdev->queue_irq_num = res->end - res->start;
+
+	regs = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(regs)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(regs);
+		qdma_err(qdev, "Failed to map IO resource, err %d", ret);
+		goto failed;
+	}
+
+	qdev->regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(&pdev->dev, regs,
+					     &qdma_regmap_config);
+	if (IS_ERR(qdev->regmap)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(qdev->regmap);
+		qdma_err(qdev, "Regmap init failed, err %d", ret);
+		goto failed;
+	}
+
+	ret = qdma_device_verify(qdev);
+	if (ret)
+		goto failed;
+
+	ret = qdma_get_hw_info(qdev);
+	if (ret)
+		goto failed;
+
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&qdev->dma_dev.channels);
+
+	ret = qdma_device_setup(qdev);
+	if (ret)
+		goto failed;
+
+	ret = qdma_intr_init(qdev);
+	if (ret) {
+		qdma_err(qdev, "Failed to initialize IRQs %d", ret);
+		return ret;

Should it be "goto failed"?

+	}
+	qdev->status |= QDMA_DEV_STATUS_INTR_INIT;
+
+	dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, qdev->dma_dev.cap_mask);
+	dma_cap_set(DMA_PRIVATE, qdev->dma_dev.cap_mask);

...

+struct qdma_device {
+	struct platform_device		*pdev;
+	struct dma_device		dma_dev;
+	struct regmap			*regmap;
+	struct mutex			ctxt_lock; /* protect ctxt registers */
+	const struct qdma_reg_field	*rfields;
+	const struct qdma_reg		*roffs;
+	struct qdma_queue		*h2c_queues;
+	struct qdma_queue		*c2h_queues;
+	struct qdma_intr_ring		*qintr_rings;
+	u32				qintr_ring_num;
+	u32				qintr_ring_idx;
+	u32				chan_num;
+	u32				queue_irq_start;
+	u32				queue_irq_num;
+	u32				err_irq_idx;
+	u32				fid;
+	u32				status;

Using such a mechanism with this 'status' in the probe and amd_qdma_remove(), apparently only to simplify the error handling of the probe looks really unusual to me.

CJ

+};

...




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux