shravan chippa wrote:
> From: Shravan Chippa <shravan.chippa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Update sf-pdma driver to adopt generic DMA device tree bindings.
> It calls of_dma_controller_register() with sf-pdma specific
> of_dma_xlate to get the generic DMA device tree helper support
> and the DMA clients can look up the sf-pdma controller using
> standard APIs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shravan Chippa <shravan.chippa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c b/drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c
> index d1c6956af452..c7558c9f9ac3 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_dma.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> #include "sf-pdma.h"
> @@ -490,6 +491,33 @@ static void sf_pdma_setup_chans(struct sf_pdma *pdma)
> }
> }
>
> +static struct dma_chan *sf_pdma_of_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec,
> + struct of_dma *ofdma)
> +{
> + struct sf_pdma *pdma = ofdma->of_dma_data;
> + struct device *dev = pdma->dma_dev.dev;
> + struct sf_pdma_chan *chan;
> + struct dma_chan *c;
> + u32 channel_id;
> +
> + if (dma_spec->args_count != 1) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Bad number of cells\n");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + channel_id = dma_spec->args[0];
> +
> + chan = &pdma->chans[channel_id];
> +
> + c = dma_get_slave_channel(&chan->vchan.chan);
> + if (!c) {
> + dev_err(dev, "No more channels available\n");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + return c;
> +}
> +
> static int sf_pdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct sf_pdma *pdma;
> @@ -563,7 +591,20 @@ static int sf_pdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + ret = of_dma_controller_register(pdev->dev.of_node,
> + sf_pdma_of_xlate, pdma);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "Can't register SiFive Platform OF_DMA. (%d)\n", ret);
> + goto err_unregister;
> + }
> +
Hi Shrivan,
Doesn't this need a matching unregister/free call in the
sf_pdma_remove function?
/Emil
> return 0;
> +
> +err_unregister:
> + dma_async_device_unregister(&pdma->dma_dev);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int sf_pdma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
