On 2023/8/21 13:47, Vinod Koul wrote: > On 16-08-23, 10:03, Yu Liao wrote: >> Make use of the struct_size() helper instead of an open-coded version, >> in order to avoid any potential type mistakes or integer overflows that, >> in the worst scenario, could lead to heap overflows. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/dma/fsl-edma.c | 3 +-- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsl-edma.c b/drivers/dma/fsl-edma.c >> index e40769666e39..caca3566ba82 100644 >> --- a/drivers/dma/fsl-edma.c >> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsl-edma.c >> @@ -270,7 +270,6 @@ static int fsl_edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; >> struct fsl_edma_engine *fsl_edma; >> const struct fsl_edma_drvdata *drvdata = NULL; >> - struct fsl_edma_chan *fsl_chan; >> struct edma_regs *regs; >> int len, chans; >> int ret, i; >> @@ -288,7 +287,7 @@ static int fsl_edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> return ret; >> } >> >> - len = sizeof(*fsl_edma) + sizeof(*fsl_chan) * chans; >> + len = struct_size(fsl_edma, chans, chans); >> fsl_edma = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, len, GFP_KERNEL); > > Drop len and use struct_size() here... Thank you for the review. I'll make the suggested changes and send you the V2. Best regards, Yu > >> if (!fsl_edma) >> return -ENOMEM; >> -- >> 2.25.1 >
