Hi Baolu,
On Fri, 5 May 2023 10:58:38 +0800, Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> On 5/5/23 7:03 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> >>> +static int intel_iommu_attach_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain
> >>> *domain,
> >>> + struct device *dev,
> >>> ioasid_t pasid) +{
> >>> + struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> >>> + struct dmar_domain *dmar_domain = to_dmar_domain(domain);
> >>> + struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
> >>> + int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (!pasid_supported(iommu))
> >>> + return -ENODEV;
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = prepare_domain_attach_device(domain, dev);
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * Most likely the device context has already been set up,
> >>> will only
> >>> + * take a domain ID reference. Otherwise, device context will
> >>> be set
> >>> + * up here.
> >> The "otherwise" case is only default domain deferred attaching case,
> >> right?
> > it might be the only case so far, but my intention is to be general.
> > i.e. no ordering requirements. I believe it is more future proof in case
> > device_attach_pasid called before device_attach.
>
> Let's put aside deferred attach and talk about it later.
>
> The device's context entry is configured when the default domain is
> being attached to the device. And, the default domain attaching is in
> the iommu probe_device path. It always happens before set_device_pasid
> which is designed to be called by the device driver. So the real
> situation is that when the device driver calls set_device_pasid, the
> context entry should already have been configured.
>
> Then let's pick up the deferred attach case. It is a workaround for
> kdump (Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst). I don't think PASID
> feature is functionally required by any kdump capture kernel as its
> main purpose is to dump the memory of a panic kernel.
>
> In summary, it seems to be reasonable for the vt-d driver to return
> -EBUSY when a device's context was copied. The idxd driver should
> continue to work without kernel DMA with PASID support.
>
> if (context_copied(iommu, bus, devfn))
> return -EBUSY;
>
> Make things general is always good, but this doesn't mean that we need
> to make the code complex to support cases that do not exist or are not
> used. Thoughts?
>
Good point, it is better not put dead code in. Let me also document this
behavior for future change that may affect the ordering requirement.
Thanks,
Jacob
