Hi Baolu, On Wed, 3 May 2023 14:49:36 +0800, Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 4/28/23 1:49 AM, Jacob Pan wrote: > > @@ -2433,12 +2477,17 @@ static int > > dmar_domain_attach_device_pasid(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct > > intel_iommu *iommu, struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid) > > { > > + struct device_pasid_info *dev_pasid; > > + unsigned long flags; > > int ret; > > > > - /* PASID table is mandatory for a PCI device in scalable mode. > > */ if (!sm_supported(iommu) && dev_is_real_dma_subdevice(dev)) > > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > > > + dev_pasid = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev_pasid), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!dev_pasid) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > if (hw_pass_through && domain_type_is_si(domain)) > > ret = intel_pasid_setup_pass_through(iommu, domain, > > dev, pasid); else if (domain->use_first_level) > > @@ -2446,6 +2495,17 @@ static int > > dmar_domain_attach_device_pasid(struct dmar_domain *domain, else > > ret = intel_pasid_setup_second_level(iommu, domain, > > dev, pasid); > > + if (ret) { > > + kfree(dev_pasid); > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > + dev_pasid->pasid = pasid; > > + dev_pasid->dev = dev; > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->lock, flags); > > + list_add(&dev_pasid->link_domain, &domain->dev_pasids); > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->lock, flags); > > + > > return 0; > > } > > > > @@ -2467,16 +2527,13 @@ static int dmar_domain_attach_device(struct > > dmar_domain *domain, return ret; > > info->domain = domain; > > spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->lock, flags); > > + if (info->dev_attached) { > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->lock, flags); > > + return 0; > > + } > > list_add(&info->link, &domain->devices); > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->lock, flags); > > > > - ret = dmar_domain_attach_device_pasid(domain, iommu, dev, > > - IOMMU_DEF_RID_PASID); > > - if (ret) { > > - dev_err(dev, "Setup RID2PASID failed\n"); > > - device_block_translation(dev); > > - } > > - > > ret = domain_context_mapping(domain, dev); > > if (ret) { > > dev_err(dev, "Domain context map failed\n"); > > @@ -2485,8 +2542,9 @@ static int dmar_domain_attach_device(struct > > dmar_domain *domain, } > > > > iommu_enable_pci_caps(info); > > + info->dev_attached = 1; > > > > - return 0; > > + return ret; > > } > > > > static bool device_has_rmrr(struct device *dev) > > @@ -4044,6 +4102,7 @@ static void device_block_translation(struct > > device *dev) > > spin_lock_irqsave(&info->domain->lock, flags); > > list_del(&info->link); > > + info->dev_attached = 0; > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->domain->lock, flags); > > > > domain_detach_iommu(info->domain, iommu); > > @@ -4175,8 +4234,15 @@ static int intel_iommu_attach_device(struct > > iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev) > > { > > struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev); > > + struct dmar_domain *dmar_domain = to_dmar_domain(domain); > > + struct intel_iommu *iommu; > > + u8 bus, devfn; > > int ret; > > > > + iommu = device_to_iommu(dev, &bus, &devfn); > > + if (!iommu) > > + return -ENODEV; > > + > > if (domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED && > > device_is_rmrr_locked(dev)) { > > dev_warn(dev, "Device is ineligible for IOMMU domain > > attach due to platform RMRR requirement. Contact your platform > > vendor.\n"); @@ -4190,7 +4256,23 @@ static int > > intel_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain, if (ret) return > > ret; > > - return dmar_domain_attach_device(to_dmar_domain(domain), dev); > > + ret = dmar_domain_attach_device(to_dmar_domain(domain), dev); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_err(dev, "Attach device failed\n"); > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > + /* PASID table is mandatory for a PCI device in scalable mode. > > */ > > + if (sm_supported(iommu) && !dev_is_real_dma_subdevice(dev)) { > > + /* Setup the PASID entry for requests without PASID: */ > > + ret = dmar_domain_attach_device_pasid(dmar_domain, > > iommu, dev, > > + > > IOMMU_DEF_RID_PASID); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_err(dev, "Setup RID2PASID failed\n"); > > + device_block_translation(dev); > > + } > > + } > > + return ret; > > } > > > > static int intel_iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, > > I am not following why do you need to change the attach_device path in > this patch. Perhaps you want to make sure that context entry for the > device is configured before attach_device_pasid? This is just refactoring, with this patch attach_device is broken down into 1. prepare_domain_attach_device() 2. dmar_domain_attach_device() 3. dmar_domain_attach_device_pasid() the change is due to factoring out dmar_domain_attach_device_pasid(). device context set up in #2, already ensured before PASID attachment. perhaps I miss your point? Thanks, Jacob