On 05/04/23 01:53, Péter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
>
> On 04/04/2023 11:11, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
>> From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx>
>>
>> In case K3 DMA glue layer is using UDMA channels (AM65/J721E/J7200) it
>> doesn't need to create own DMA devices per RX/TX channels as they are
>> never
>> used and just waste resources. The UDMA based platforms are coherent and
>> UDMA device iteslf is used for DMA memory management.
>>
>> Hence, update K3 DMA glue layer to create K3 DMA glue DMA devices per
>> RX/TX
>> channels only in case of PKTDMA (AM64) where coherency configurable
>> per DMA
>> channel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++------------------
>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c
>> b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c
>> index 789193ed0386..b0c9572b0d02 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c
>> @@ -293,19 +293,18 @@ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel
>> *k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev,
>> }
>> tx_chn->udma_tchan_id = xudma_tchan_get_id(tx_chn->udma_tchanx);
>> - tx_chn->common.chan_dev.class = &k3_udma_glue_devclass;
>> - tx_chn->common.chan_dev.parent =
>> xudma_get_device(tx_chn->common.udmax);
>> - dev_set_name(&tx_chn->common.chan_dev, "tchan%d-0x%04x",
>> - tx_chn->udma_tchan_id, tx_chn->common.dst_thread);
>> - ret = device_register(&tx_chn->common.chan_dev);
>> - if (ret) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "Channel Device registration failed %d\n", ret);
>> - put_device(&tx_chn->common.chan_dev);
>> - tx_chn->common.chan_dev.parent = NULL;
>> - goto err;
>> - }
>> -
>> if (xudma_is_pktdma(tx_chn->common.udmax)) {
>
> it might be possible to narrow it down to include a test for atype_asel
> 14 or 15, but then I would move that test to a helper (passing common as
> parameter) and re-use it in other places to avoid getting out o sync
> overtime.
> Might not worth the effort, just an observation.
Irrespective, we should at least add check for atype_asel == 14/15 along
with xudma_is_pktdma().
Refractoring these checks to separate function can be patch of its own
>
>> + tx_chn->common.chan_dev.class = &k3_udma_glue_devclass;
>> + tx_chn->common.chan_dev.parent =
>> xudma_get_device(tx_chn->common.udmax);
>> + dev_set_name(&tx_chn->common.chan_dev, "tchan%d-0x%04x",
>> + tx_chn->udma_tchan_id, tx_chn->common.dst_thread);
>> + ret = device_register(&tx_chn->common.chan_dev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Channel Device registration failed %d\n",
>> ret);
>
> my guess is that the put_device() is still needed, no?
Agree
>
>> + tx_chn->common.chan_dev.parent = NULL;
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> +
>> /* prepare the channel device as coherent */
[...]
--
Regards
Vignesh
